DISCUSSION OF AND POTENTIAL COMMITTEE ACTION ON POSSIBLE COUNTY  
					BOARD RESPONSES TO MANAGEMENT AND EQUITY CONCERNS AT HENRY VILAS  
					ZOO  
					NO COMMITTEE ACTION TAKEN ON ITEM. Chair Miles mentioned the likelihood of  
					scheduling further discussion on the topic at a future meeting.  
					Public Comment: **See attached Registration Report** for positions on agenda  
					item.discussion.  
					For detailed information about the committee and other comments, see the meeting  
					audio/ video posted with the agenda in legistar.  
					Those who spoke to the committee:  
					- In support of an independent investigation of the Henry Vilas Zoo:  
					Travis Thomas, Brian Standing, Erik Andersen, Derek Wallace  
					- Neither supporting nor opposing:  
					Neil Rainford  
					Chair Miles opened up the discussion by enumerating a number of possible options for  
					the County Board to address the recent workforce equity issues at Henry Vilas Zoo:  
					1) Establish an independent outside investigation at the zoo  
					2) Evaluate internally the management analysis completed by OEI and Human  
					Resources in response to the personnel complaints at the zoo.  
					3) Evaluate externally--with an outside reviewer--the management analysis completed by  
					OEI and Human Resources in response to the personnel complaints at the zoo  
					4) Conduct program evaluation/operational audit as a part of the County Board Office  
					function.  
					Supervisors Erickson, Kigeya, Gray, Palm, Doolan, Wright, Schauer, and Smith all  
					spoke to the topic and indicated an interest in restoring the public trust in the zoo and/or  
					supporting Dane County employees. Several argued in support of an independent  
					investigation and others argued for first receiving more information about the jurisdiction  
					of the County Board and a comparison of options presented. On this second point,  
					Corporation Counsel indicated it would be available to analyze the options for action and  
					weigh in from a legal perspective on the pros and cons of the various options  
					enumerated.  
					Corporation Counsel Carlos Pabellon indicated that the County Executive is charged with  
					the management of county personnel and that this authority cannot be diluted by the  
					County Board. His opinion is that the County Board cannot usurp the role of the  
					Executive in managing and investigating specific allegations regarding personnel issues  
					and that such a move would constitute a conflict that limits the County Executive's  
					authority. There is also a question of how differing opinions from multiple investigations  
					would be resolved.  
					However, Pabellon indicated that the County Board does have authority to conduct  
					investigations/analyses of county affairs and operations, e.g., a more general  
					investigation of overall hiring and retention practices, policies, and work environment--just  
					not specific personnel issues and active legal cases, which are in the purview of the  
					Executive branch.  
					Supervisors asked further questions and commented. See meeting recordings for  
					detailed discussion.