Dane County  
Minutes - Final Unless Amended by  
Committee  
Dane County Broadband Task Force  
Thursday, November 2, 2023  
9:00 AM  
This is a Hybrid Meeting: Attend in person at  
City-County Building, Room 354, 210 Martin Luther  
King, Jr. Blvd; Attend virtually via Zoom.  
A. Call To Order  
Staff: Jaron McCallum, Majid Allen, Cass Hill, and Lauren Kuhl  
Chair RATCLIFF called the meeting to order at 9:01 AM.  
12 - KATE MCGINNITY, TODD VIOLANTE, RENEE LAUBER, MELISSA RATCLIFF,  
BOB WIPPERFURTH, BILL DICKMEYER, DEANA ZENTNER, JOYCE  
TIKALSKY, PETER WEIL, JEFF GLAZER, SARAH EDGERTON, and DAVID  
DIGIOVANNI  
Present  
3 - MICHELLE JENSEN, ANDREW HOYOS, and SARAH GHEE  
Excused  
B. Consideration of Minutes  
Minutes of the October 5, 2023 Dane County Broadband Task Force  
Meeting  
Attachments:  
A motion was made by WIPPERFURTH, seconded by GLAZER, that the Minutes  
be approved. The motion carried by a voice vote.  
C. Action Items  
D. Presentations  
E. Reports to Committee  
1. Report on Activities from Dane County Broadband Coordinator  
Jaron McCallum, Dane County Broadband Coordinator presented on what he has been  
working on since starting.  
OUTREACH TO COMMUNITIES  
Has been to town and village meetings and has met with several people in  
communities.  
Went to Towns Association meeting.  
When doing outreach, stresses importance of broadband, why people should care, lack  
of regulation in broadband industry, as well as economics of situation (how providers  
decide to expand to different areas), what current providers are in the area, what  
funding opportunities exist. Inquire about what community has done to try to improve  
broadband.  
Moved AECOM Report Status to beginning of the meeting  
Staff have been working with AECOM to produce final copy of report. Final edits are  
expected to be delivered to Planning by November 6th.  
OUTREACH TO ISP'S  
Have talked with approximately 20 ISP’s since starting.  
Have met with ISP’s both proactively and have been contacted by some as well to  
meet.  
Ratcliff inquired if the visits with ISP have been well received, and Jaron indicated that  
they have.  
McGinnity inquired about the number of Towns that Jaron met with, Jaron estimated 10,  
but has had communication with a majority.  
Weil inquired if the topic of interacting with ISP’s and towns have come up. Jaron  
indicated that most ISP’s are willing to talk with communities that are interested. Weil  
noted that if conversations are going to be had with ISP’s, the questions should be  
asked as to why some ISP’s are not interested in meeting with communities.  
Have had conversations with Alliant Energy, and where the AECOM report fits in.  
Wipperfurth left at 9:21am  
Glazer asked about more detail regarding Alliant Energy.  
Jaron indicated that they are open to some synergies if they do not need to do any  
route changes. His impression is that it is more limited than he originally thought when  
going in. They also spoke about the challenges of negotiating with an ISP to tap into  
their infrastructure.  
Glazer asked if Jaron had the sense that it’s an infrastructure problem. Jaron indicated  
they’ve put fiber where it makes sense from a business standpoint, but they’re not an  
ISP.  
Glazer inquired if the county could play a role bridging the gap between ISP’s and  
Alliant. Jaron indicated that it could be a potential role.  
Ratcliff inquired if Alliant could play a role similar to MUFN, Jaron indicated they are not  
really in that kind of a business.  
Glazer asked if there is a sense that there are other private providers that may be  
interested in something similar to Alliant Energy. Jaron indicated there may be more to  
discuss middle mile.  
PSC BEAD PROPOSAL  
Jaron and Task Force leadership provided input as to how the PSC will establish  
community anchor institutions for funding. Comments submitted include bringing  
opportunities into alignment, funding mechanisms, increase state challenge process  
timeline. The comments are public and available to see.  
The PSC is meeting on Friday, 11/3, and the BEAD proposal is on their agenda.  
PSC CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND  
Talking with ISP’s and municipalities to get application in by November 7. Have worked  
with one municipality to get an application to be submitted.  
OTHER PROJECTS  
Working with AECOM, went to UW Extension Broadband training in October and met  
with state, federal, local contacts.  
Ratcliff asked about next steps for Jaron noting that his role as the middle person is  
advantageous.  
2. Discussion of Task Force Next Steps  
Jaron indicated that next steps the Task Force may be involved in is what role the  
county may have financially in grant applications. Jaron indicated that having a funding  
match on the table, the ISP may be more likely to add the municipality to the top of their  
priority list.  
Find a way to strategically meet with municipalities, where they are to meet their needs.  
Is it regional meetings, a broadband workshop in one spot in the county – what is the  
best way to do this  
Can a website be developed to provide resources at disposal.  
Is there a way regarding permitting to keep better tabs of where ISP’s are doing work.  
Look at ways in the future to streamline or understand the process for permitting.  
A few items from the AECOM report could go in the “maybe” bucket for the Task Force  
to work on and need further research.Renee indicated she can work with Jaron on  
contacting the 32 towns – there are 7 regions that the Towns Association uses.  
McGinnity indicated that Supervisors that represent towns could be part of connecting  
the towns as well.  
Edgerton indicated the City of Madison is also dealing with this. Have a contact sheet  
as a point of reference for someone to talk to try to help with ISP’s putting in fiber with  
not much communication.  
Ratcliff noted the interest in advocacy with the state to change state statute. The need  
to continue to bring up the importance of broadband to the state.  
3. AECOM Report Status  
Staff are working on remaining items with AECOM  
F. Future Meeting Items and Dates  
December 7th, 2023 at 9:00am  
G. Public Comment on Items not on the Agenda  
H. Such Other Business as Allowed by Law  
I. Adjourn  
A motion was made by GLAZER, seconded by MCGINNITY, that the meeting be  
adjourned. The motion carried unanimously.  
The meeting adjourned at 9:58am.  
Minutes respectfully submitted by Lauren Kuhl, pending Task Force approval