1. Potential Dashboards for Pretrial Data
Presented by Anadon
Reviewed different metrics that could be reported in the dashboards. Discussion of
financial conditions of release, reporting of Public Safety Assessments (PSA),
performance metrics, baseline measures, such as court appearance rate, release rate,
and public safety rate (reflecting the number of people who are and are not arrested on
new charges while on pretrial release). Emphasis on changing from a decision-making
framework (DMF) to a release conditions matrix (RCM) to reflect goals of pretrial release.
Discussion of performance measures to evaluate process rather than sharing the
numbers and statistics without context.
Discussion ensued regarding distinction between the actual assessment of a signature
bond by the court commissioner compared to the PSA recommendation of a signature
bond. Discussion about the number of charges versus people who are in the jail with
holds. Discussion of meaningful performance measures that can move towards policy.
Distinction between actuarial data compared to an actuarial assessment in regard to
predicting someone’s failure to appear. Discussion of defining a non-appearance, and
whether that is measured at the individual person or charge level.
PSA DATA VISUALIZATIONS
2. Extension of PSA Study
Presented by Clark-Bernhardt and Esqueda
PSA Assessors are in the 2022 budget. The Access to Justice Lab (A2J) is interested in
doing a study within the existing PSA project regarding probable cause statements. This
would require transcripts of a lot of initial appearance proceedings. Transcripts will be the
challenging piece, but these are public records.
3. MDRC Update
Presented by Clark-Bernhardt
MDRC is in the process of completing a dosage study to determine how much pretrial
services supervision is appropriate for different people on pretrial release. This process
has slowed slightly with staffing changes but is ongoing.
4. Advancing Pretrial Policy and Research (APPR): Next Steps and Timeline for
Technical Assistance
Presented by Clark-Bernhardt
APPR emphasizes the need to move from a decision-making framework (DMF) to a
release condition matrix (RCM) to reflect the goals of pretrial release. This shifts the
focus and perspective of pretrial justice and creates a more equitable system. There is a
technical assistance program that would be beneficial, but it would be resource-intensive
on pretrial services to apply. The CJC-PT would need to include motion language on a
future meeting agenda to move this forward.